Pinnacle wood pellet terminal



Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby Head Dissident » Wed May 23, 2012 3:45 pm

Can somebody explain to me how the Water St / Graham Ave residents have any leg to stand on regarding their opposition to this project?..... The proposed terminal will sit in relatively the same location as the old grain elevator, and I'm pretty sure that the elevator was louder and dustier than this newly proposed facility.

This attitude of "not in my back yard" is quite disheartening ..... we need these projects, and I for one welcome Pinnacle Renewable Energy
Head Dissident

Mavis Beacon Lover
Mavis Beacon Lover
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby bthedog » Wed May 23, 2012 3:47 pm

I 100% agree!
bthedog

Ginsu Knife Salesperson
Ginsu Knife Salesperson
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:11 pm

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby jees » Wed May 23, 2012 7:09 pm

Those residents bought their property next to industrial zoned land, they shouldn't be surprised to see industrial development.

Well written opinion piece in the Northern View:
http://www.thenorthernview.com/opinion/153138145.html
jees

User avatar
Plays a doctor on TV
Plays a doctor on TV
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 11:37 am

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby Jabber63 » Wed May 23, 2012 7:49 pm

they don't have a leg to stand on but when it comes to public opinion legality does not apply, if they can turn the public against it then they win legal or not
Jabber63

Plays a doctor on TV
Plays a doctor on TV
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:15 pm

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby Crazy Train » Wed May 23, 2012 7:59 pm

I like the comment at the end of the Northern View article which discusses being open for business. While I can understand the need to have a waterfront plan in place, it's embarrassing that it has to occur at this point. To be fair though, we are in a state of transition in which Ridley Island has been targeted in plans for most of the future industrial development. I'm somewhat surprised that this project has been targeted for the old Westview site when there is increasing development at Ridley. Why not put it there? That's not to say that I don't support the project on the waterfront but why there instead of Ridley? In a perfect world it would be nice to eventually have our waterfront to be developed into park land and something other than industrial, but at the same time, beggars can't be choosers. This town was built on industry and in order for the town to survive, we will have to rely on further industrial development.
Crazy Train

Plays a doctor on TV
Plays a doctor on TV
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:32 pm

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby justhereforthesun » Thu May 24, 2012 7:54 am

Check out www.pelletfreeneighborhood.wordpress.com for why the pellet plant should be located at Ridley Island.
In short, major fire and explosion hazard, potential for hazardous dust emissions, and a down grading of the quality of life in town which in turn depresses the economy. i.e. this is not a nice place to live or visit

This is not a Water st/Graham Ave issue, it is a community wide issue and involves how we envision this place to be.

Zoning in that area has also been changed since the days of Rupert Cement and the grain terminal to RM3 to encourage residential development.

The waterfront plan should have been in place years ago, however this is a new council since Dec and they are keen to complete it. It is the port that is dragging their feet on that one right now.
justhereforthesun

 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 7:44 am

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby bthedog » Thu May 24, 2012 8:16 am

The port owns the land....thus they should get to decide what to do with that land...end of story.

Bottom line, despite the problems that come along with this pellet plant, is the home owners on Water St/Beach Place CHOSE to buy land next to a traditionally industrial area, so IMO they really have no leg to stand on.
bthedog

Ginsu Knife Salesperson
Ginsu Knife Salesperson
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:11 pm

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby justhereforthesun » Thu May 24, 2012 8:26 am

The Port does not own the land. That is crown land managed by the federal government on the behalf of all of us. The Port is an entity created by Parliament to manage its wide and diverse land interests and has directors appointed by the city, province, and federal goverment.

Therefore the Port is required to manage the land in the best interests of everyone. The question at hand is what is in the best interest of the community? Are we better served by having this facility on Ridley Island and ultilizing the waterfront for other types of economic development?
justhereforthesun

 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 7:44 am

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby Speedy » Thu May 24, 2012 3:50 pm

Just build it on the Water front since I don't see anything else being built there in the next few years. Something that will bring jobs and so many rupert people just keep on bitching and bitching LOL
Speedy

User avatar
Ginsu Knife Salesperson
Ginsu Knife Salesperson
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:16 pm
Location: Prince Rupert

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby mcsash » Thu May 24, 2012 4:46 pm

Unbelieveable are some of the comments here.
You have all become a hoard of whore mongers...BUSINESS>>>DEVELPOMENT>>JOBS>>INDUSTRY...Christ we HAD all that at one time and no one ever did anything for the good citizens of PR. I have lived here all my life and with the Port of Prince Rupert taking over its has gotten worse. They have eliminated water front access in Prince Rupert and at Ridley Island.
They need to take a lesson from Alcan who basically built Kitimat pools and Ice rinks.
There needs to be a balance here folks....there is industrial land at ridley, watson island and in the industrial park. I wouldnt want a pellet plant in my front yard nor would I want on the best land that rupert has to offer.

Im all in favour of `new business`provided they aint a head shop on 3rd ave....BUT we need to have access to our waterfront...If i was on council i would freaking GIVE the mill to CN and its partners in exchange for the rail yard on the waterfront be relocated so we could have a real park on the waterfront......

The current state of affairs thats on the waterfront is an absolute disgrace and and embarassment..

EFF off pellet plant....go somewhere else in the area...
mcsash

User avatar
Ginsu Knife Salesperson
Ginsu Knife Salesperson
 
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:17 am

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby Bbop » Thu May 24, 2012 4:53 pm

I have to assume that the people doing the complaining about Pinnacle Pellets would be people that live in the area and have first-hand experience with Pinnacle.
For those that don't know, there has been a pellet facility at Ridley for a number of years. Not sure if it's Pinnacle or Houston pellets....same dif.
The dust produced from this operation was so bad that Ridley Terminals refused to handle the product until the dust issue was settled, which from what I hear, never happened.
The coal port was not designed to handle, really, anything but coal. The owners of the pellet facility made the same promise....no, of course it'll be virtually dust free......not.
Maybe the dust issue has been remedied, and maybe it hasn't. Do you want Prince Rupert in a constant haze of pellet dust? It is unhealthy to say the least.
Eventually, hopefully, the waterfront area will be a fantastic residential area. The area in question is just too close to the main town.
The old grain elevator was noisy enough, and at times dusty, but nothing compared to what pellet dust is like....I worked at the old grain until we all moved to Ridley Island.
Again, in my opinion, this is not a 'Graham and Water Street' issue at all.
Bbop

Script Kiddie
Script Kiddie
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 7:08 pm

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby heartsick » Mon May 28, 2012 2:54 pm

to bthldog and jees,

so if the Port decided to build a nuclear facility on that portion of the waterfront, you would be all for it? Afterall, the Port owns the property and they should be able to build whatever they want, right?
heartsick

 
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:43 pm

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby Jabber63 » Mon May 28, 2012 9:20 pm

hell yea put a nuclear power plant in prince rupert, lots of jobs during construction and we wouldn't have to flood millions of acres of forest land for hydro power
Jabber63

Plays a doctor on TV
Plays a doctor on TV
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:15 pm

2 cents

Postby teddybear » Tue May 29, 2012 7:39 am

Just my two cents here... I have never posted on here before but this pellet debate is driving me crazy.

Let’s look at the facts that are out there instead of pulling stuff out of nowhere and exaggerating it until we are blue in the face. If you read the environmental assessment screening report found on the pinnacle website http://www.pinnaclepellet.com/images/DR ... Report.pdf it says at full build out it would be 20-25 ships per year so even in the slight chance dust was an issue it wouldn’t be as described earlier as a constant wood pellet dust haze. Lets now look at why they have decided to go to westview. It is an existing industrial land and therefore the environmental assessment is 1/100 of the time that it would have been on an property on ridley so they clearly want to get operating and employing asap...which is a nice change (take note canpotex).Finally anyone that has the idea that Cn would even want Watson island in exchange for the property down on the waterfront is high off their tush. As much as i would like to see a park and seawall like amenities down there it just isnt going to happen so long as those tracks are down there and news flash.....they aren’t going anywhere for the next century. Instead of picking on this project we should be working with the port and cn to work on other areas around the community where we could get better waterfront access. Finally I am sorry residents in the area but if you had concerns you shouldn’t buy near an industrial area even if there is the slightest chance it could be redeveloped
teddybear

 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 7:19 am

Re: Pinnacle wood pellet terminal

Postby bthedog » Tue May 29, 2012 8:27 am

Could not agree more^
bthedog

Ginsu Knife Salesperson
Ginsu Knife Salesperson
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:11 pm

Next

Return to Prince Rupert Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests